Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 3:45 pm
My desription contain: "WCC3. Level 30. No sound. FS 4.". I don't know Phil why you write '[stage ??]'.
Your original upload did not include the "Level 30" in the description.destructor wrote:My desription contain: "WCC3. Level 30. No sound. FS 4.". I don't know Phil why you write '[stage ??]'.
What What???!?!?!?!?destructor wrote:Mega crash game. Never more old stupid classic games.
Welcome to the wonderful world of analog overflow.destructor wrote:Sometimes cursor turn other side than I want or trace disappear when it not should disappear.
The issue is also discussed at:LN2 (in another thread) wrote:Oh yes...I forgot to note that...you can "overload" the input..where it gets out of range so then has that kind of result for many games. It makes it hard for some games...for example in centipede...if I move the mouse smoothly and not too fast then it tracks very well..but if I extremely quickly move from left-to-right for example, the result is the control actually goes a little to the left or just stays in pace and jitters.
Wow. I'll have to try it. If it's the same for me, I may come back to this game after the WCC crowd leaves. I'll see if it improves performance on Centipede too.destructor wrote:This problems I don't have in mame61(standard).
Pole position, donkey kong, pacman - this is classicDax wrote:What What???!?!?!?!?destructor wrote:Mega crash game. Never more old stupid classic games.
Ive had more fun this week playing this "Stupid classic" than I have in any previous weeks. This game is awesome. A 1982 Atari original stupid?!?!? Or is it only stupid because its not your strong suit?
Don't listen to him Phil. He's crazy. Or maybe just young. Keep the classics coming. Many of us appreciate them greatly.
Dax wrote:Don't listen to him Phil. He's crazy. Or maybe just young. Keep the classics coming. Many of us appreciate them greatly.
I only thought that my inp playback incorrectly. It's my first recorded inp (and maybe last).Weehawk wrote:Your original upload did not include the "Level 30" in the description.destructor wrote:My desription contain: "WCC3. Level 30. No sound. FS 4.". I don't know Phil why you write '[stage ??]'.
He obviously saw that and either you were both allowed to edit independently, or one of you edited without noticing the other's edit.
I can play on each game with no mouse or mouse control (look Reactor) but game must work correctly.Dax wrote:What What???!?!?!?!?destructor wrote:Mega crash game. Never more old stupid classic games.
Ive had more fun this week playing this "Stupid classic" than I have in any previous weeks. This game is awesome. A 1982 Atari original stupid?!?!? Or is it only stupid because its not your strong suit?
Don't listen to him Phil. He's crazy. Or maybe just young. Keep the classics coming. Many of us appreciate them greatly.
Doesn't work any better for me in mame61...damn...you got my hopes up there.destructor wrote:I can play on each game with no mouse or mouse control (look Reactor) but game must work correctly.
If none of you hotshots can take out ron(42%)cli's score, I would ask that the editors analyze his inp to check for any objective evidence that it was not played at regulation speed.destructor wrote:Congratulation Dax. This round is your. Probably if control over mouse would was correct you would make higher score, probably higher from Roncli's score.
I think Snipercade's Decathalon fits that criteria... well, most of it.Weehawk wrote: I sorta wish there was a site like MARP devoted to games from the golden era which, in my view started circa 1978 (with Space Invaders) and ended circa 1984 (with Kung Fu Master).
Perhaps at some point MARP could have a tournament for classic games only...... :-k
LN2 wrote:it would be nice to know what stage he reached though.
What? What analyze? I look his inp (not one time) and play his method. Very good method and very good inp but fatal finish I learn this method in 1/2 hour and make score 100k on stage 30 in next 1/2 hour.Weehawk wrote: If none of you hotshots can take out ron(42%)cli's score, I would ask that the editors analyze his inp to check for any objective evidence that it was not played at regulation speed.
I agree, often I don't like Golden Age games because of their harsh commands and gameplay. But this one is very cool. Commands are smooth and with a good mouse, I can play and replay all the night. It's not the case with all games, even with the most recents.Weehawk wrote:I sorta wish there was a site like MARP devoted to games from the golden era which, in my view started circa 1978 (with Space Invaders) and ended circa 1984 (with Kung Fu Master).Dax wrote:Don't listen to him Phil. He's crazy. Or maybe just young. Keep the classics coming. Many of us appreciate them greatly.
Perhaps at some point MARP could have a tournament for classic games only......
Yup, the scrolling platform game concept marked the end of the Golden Era.Weehawk wrote:I sorta wish there was a site like MARP devoted to games from the golden era which, in my view started circa 1978 (with Space Invaders) and ended circa 1984 (with Kung Fu Master).