Please Vote -- proposal to archive mahjong/poker games

Queenmary · Post by **Queenmary** » Wed Feb 21, 2001 12:30 pm

I vote "B"

--
mdelprat@club-internet.fr

Aquatarkus · Post by **Aquatarkus** » Thu Feb 22, 2001 12:30 pm

I vote B.
That may not be the way I vote in the event this comes up again as a more general debate of what should or should not qualify as a test of video game skill. But that isn't what was asked this time. What was asked this time is "Is 2 player Mah Jongg less worthy of MARP leaderboard points than Trivial Pursuit, Top Players Golf, or Attaxx?"

--
aquatarkus@digicron.com

Lagavulin · Post by **Lagavulin** » Thu Feb 22, 2001 12:30 pm

Top Player's Golf ? This game has nothing to do here ... Where is luck
part in that game ? 100% skill, 0% luck ... Like real golf.

--
darre@noos.fr

Jokie · Post by **Jokie** » Thu Feb 22, 2001 12:30 pm

don't change anything!! I love all arcade games. I'll vote B

--
jokie@toudy.com

QRS · Post by **QRS** » Thu Feb 22, 2001 12:30 pm

I vote for B

--
qrs@telia.com

Tim Balderramos · Post by **Tim Balderramos** » Fri Feb 23, 2001 12:30 pm

In the world of Arcade games there is no such thing as luck. No
one "maxes out" a game by just playing and "getting lucky." You have
to know the game, and the strategies, in order to excel. Even in
card games - where the luck of the draw is a major factor - you have
to know enough to learn how to play with the hand you're dealt (no
pun intended).



Even in those games where simply knowing exact patterns (pacman, dig
dug, etc.) will yield maximum scores, the player still has to get out
there and prove they can run the gauntlet, if you will.



Vote: B

--
pacmantab@hotmail.com

J.D. Lowe · Post by **J.D. Lowe** » Fri Feb 23, 2001 12:30 pm

Count another vote for B. "A game by any other genre would still be
just as sweet" (bad paraphrase of Shakespeare, sorry). Or maybe "A
game is a game is a game is a game." Like others have put much
better than I, any game with any kind of skill is worth points.



Sincerely,



J.D. Lowe

--
jedidrunkenllama@hotmail.com

r henry · Post by **r henry** » Fri Feb 23, 2001 12:30 pm

i vote B even tho i play none of those games i think there should be
a wider variety of games

--
ryan_henry@bigpond.com

Oliver Rigby · Post by **Oliver Rigby** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 12:30 pm

B is my answer. 

You can say that, but these games are in MAME and many of them
require skill. Also, you can say the same about Button Bashing sports
sims that they don't need to be learnt - but they are still allowed
aren't they?

--
halo@evil.co.uk

arjen gnodde · Post by **arjen gnodde** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 12:30 pm

I vote for B.

--
Arjen@ukonline.co.uk

arjen gnodde · Post by **arjen gnodde** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 12:30 pm

I accidently pressed tab and return in the last post. I voted for b.


Arjen...

--
Arjen@ukonline.co.uk

XTC · Post by **XTC** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 12:30 pm

KEEP 'em in!!!


- XTC

--
vsginc@aol.com

Jazz · Post by **Jazz** » Wed Feb 28, 2001 12:30 pm

It took me a while to figure out these games - I'm sure that replays
will assist people in learning how to play the games.
I vote B.

--
jhjazzman@hotmail.com

Mike Jeung · Post by **Mike Jeung** » Wed Feb 28, 2001 12:30 pm

They are games of skill. Thinking and planning, just not of reflexes
or hand/eye coordination. MHO, I vote that they stay (B).

--
dailun@usa.net