Posted: Sat Nov 06, 1999 12:30 pm
> But they obviously thought about it somewhat,<BR>
> otherwise why even bother with INPs at all?
<P>
Well - the original reason for adding recording/playback was so that
if there was a problem with a driver which only showed up on certain
levels, the driver developer could easily view that level by using
a .inp file that demostrated the problem.
<P>
It would still be best if we could find an open source solution to
the problem, but I really don't think that's possible. Whatever
servers the open source code connects to, and whatever time stamps,
keys, or whatever it gets from them, a recompiled-with-cheating-
enabled version could also connect to, and carry out the same
transactions with them, too.
<P>
Maybe I'm missing something, and there is a method of securing .inp
files with an open source program, but I can't see it at the moment.
Chris.
--
zwaxy@mail.com
> otherwise why even bother with INPs at all?
<P>
Well - the original reason for adding recording/playback was so that
if there was a problem with a driver which only showed up on certain
levels, the driver developer could easily view that level by using
a .inp file that demostrated the problem.
<P>
It would still be best if we could find an open source solution to
the problem, but I really don't think that's possible. Whatever
servers the open source code connects to, and whatever time stamps,
keys, or whatever it gets from them, a recompiled-with-cheating-
enabled version could also connect to, and carry out the same
transactions with them, too.
<P>
Maybe I'm missing something, and there is a method of securing .inp
files with an open source program, but I can't see it at the moment.
Chris.
--
zwaxy@mail.com