forums.marpirc.net

1 - A, 2 - B, 3 - A, 4 - C, 5 - A (10 points seems good to me), 6 -
B, 7 - C, 8 - C, 9 - A (5-10 a day)

--
javiog@teleline.es

My votes:
<p>

1. A

<p>

2. C (like others i prefer 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1)

<p>

3. A (if win the faster no mamedos players are penalized

<p>

4. c (if win the faster no mamedos players are penalized


<p>

5. c (an example : if i do 100000 on 1941 i will be cutted but if
i recorded it with a final version of mame probably it is
more useful of a 10000000 recorded with a beta version that
in some cases is very difficult to find (for example the
win32 beta).

<p>

6. c

<p>

7. c

<p>

8. c

<p>

9. c

--
adeidda@newmail.net

A fast vote in the middle of the night...
<p>

1C, 2C(add it as option), 3A, 4C, 5C, 6B, 7B(would be interesting how
big the difference will be!) 8D 9D

--
rough@c64.rulez.org

Here my votes:
<p>

1. Keep the leaderboard as it is. <strong> - B (sort by 10-3-1)
</strong>

<p>

2. Go back to a 10-3-1 system(or similar) <strong> - see 1.</strong>

<p>

3. A tie is a tie is a tie - everyone gets same points. <strong> -
A</strong>

<p>

4. If there's tie, the faster one gets greater points.<strong> -
D</strong> but I won't leave MARP

<p>

5. Have a cutoff(mention what it should be if you're A - C on this
idea) <strong> - A (5% is too low)</strong>

<p>

6. Give out points for a certain place(in the current instance, 3rd)
or better regardless of the cutoff line. <strong> - ???</strong>

<p>

7. Use the tournament rules(1st = number of recordings, 2nd = number
of recordings - 1, last = 1 point) <strong> - D - too
complicated</strong>

<p>

8. Throw out the leaderboard all together. <strong>D - I'll leave
MARP !!!</strong>

<p>

9. Limit the number of recordings / day <strong> - B - could be an
additional deterrent.</strong>

<p>


Cicca

--
cicca@writeme.com