I don't even know what you're talking about here because the only recording shown for raccoon is the wolf106 one. If the wolf141 ones were newer, then that would have overwritten the old score but it never did, unless it was deleted entirely. If you feel you have been wronged here, could you upload the wolf141 recording as a file attachment to this thread so we could take another look at the speed?simpsons99 wrote:About the speed of the games and Racoon I first played that on Wolfmame106 it was sooo slow it was unplayable.You should try it and would understand.
I went too play it on wolf141 i belive at the time. Person that watched my first inp for 106 quickly DQ'D My scores by just watching the 106 in which it should have been removed becouse the inp from 141 should have replaced that recording .
You can clearly see my posts about everything posted here on fourms within the last 6 months.
I'm sorry if you feel like you're being untreated fairly but rules are rules. Hell a month ago I made the NVRAM mistake myself and was forced to delete my recording and make a new one. Not a mistake I've made in a long time, but I got a new computer recently and forgot to remove \nvram subdirectory (and replace it with a blank read-only file). These things happen.
