ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Moderator: Chad
ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
The Asylum recording by PAC of score 3,820 does nt play back for me - you need to use WolfMAME0.128 or later for asylum to playback - as some corrections have been made that help playback since version 0.106.
Can anyone play this recording by PAC back?
Can everyone play back my recording in version 0.128?
Thanks,
Kranser.
Report this post
Can anyone play this recording by PAC back?
Can everyone play back my recording in version 0.128?
Thanks,
Kranser.
Report this post
- simpsons99
- MARP Seer
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:23 am
- Location: Snohomish Washington
- Contact:
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
I watched this INP Tonight and he is lucky to get 200 points . I watched it back with Wolf106
I was hoping for some secrets in his gameplay .
I was hoping for some secrets in his gameplay .
If you have a FB Account I'm Brian Allen
On KLOV and other sites I'm Simpsons99
Arcade Game Scores
DKJR 1,073,800 Level F Kill screen !
DK3 TG MED Skill Level 1,365,000 Level 80?
On KLOV and other sites I'm Simpsons99
Arcade Game Scores
DKJR 1,073,800 Level F Kill screen !
DK3 TG MED Skill Level 1,365,000 Level 80?
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
I'm the third person who can't play this recording back so it will be reduced to the score it plays back which is 200.
http://replay.marpirc.net/r/asylum
the wolf128 playedback for me
http://replay.marpirc.net/r/asylum
the wolf128 playedback for me
-skito
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Thanks for confirming the wolfmame 0.128 played back ok Chad. Do you think we should have a special rule for Asylum saying Wolfmame 0.128 or later is required?
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Thanks to the testers. No problem,I understand the problem I will try another record with Wolfmame 145.
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Your 3,920 score didn't playback without NVRAM (requires default NVRAM to playback correctly). Using -nvram_directory NUL is the easiest way to do this, especially now that NVRAM is split between devices (ie: can be multiple files).
It also takes the award for most boring INP. Seriously, there was zero progress past about the 4th screen.
It also takes the award for most boring INP. Seriously, there was zero progress past about the 4th screen.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Hi Mahlemiut - what 3,920 score are you talking about? Did you get the Wolf 0.106 PAC-MAN recording to playback? If so I guess playback is possible for some people on 106 - but recordings on 128 (and after) definitely seem to be more stable!
Kranser.
Kranser.
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
No, PAC uploaded a 3,960 score done in 0.145 earlier today, but it required default NVRAM to playback.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Thanks for the info Mahlemiut. Do you have a link to the recording? I don't know how to find the 3 letter folder names - I should know this (but it's been a long time and I've forgotten the formula!).mahlemiut wrote:No, PAC uploaded a 3,960 score done in 0.145 earlier today, but it required default NVRAM to playback.
Don't worry - I've found the recording on the upload page - http://marp.retrogames.com/inp/3/0/c/pa ... olf145.zip
...and - yep, I agree - boring inp - I look forward to seeing further progress with this game instead of leaching!
Thanks,
Kranser.
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Whats the problem with my inp this time? I have broken any rule? Can you explain me why you delete my inp?
PostScript: Ah! I understand it, I will try to make another "no boring Inp" no problem, thanks, mahlemuit
PostScript: Ah! I understand it, I will try to make another "no boring Inp" no problem, thanks, mahlemuit
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
http://replay.marpirc.net/rules/PAC-MAN wrote:Whats the problem with my inp this time? I have broken any rule? Can you explain me why you delete my inp?
PostScript: Ah! I understand it, I will try to make another "no boring Inp" no problem, thanks, mahlemuit
I think there were two things wrong 2.f) nvram file must be removed before recording (or use of the -nvram_directory NUL option) and I havent watched the recording but boring usually means rule 2.h) was violated.
-skito
- Phil Lamat
- Regulation Coordinator
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Looks like leeching is hard to quantify here.
Could we make a special scoring ?
my idea is to add 10000 pts for each stage completed
Could we make a special scoring ?
my idea is to add 10000 pts for each stage completed
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
We could at least ban going back and forth between the same screens more than a few times. Enemies don't seem to regenerate any other way (but I'm sure someone will prove me wrong ).
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Great replay PAC - loved watching your new score, and it all played back fine with -nvram_directory NUL option.
I'm all for banning the leeching - but when you kill the monsters you get different powerups - so maybe leaching a few times is ok to get the different powerups - but keeping on repeatably leeching should not be allowed IMO.
Kranser.
I'm all for banning the leeching - but when you kill the monsters you get different powerups - so maybe leaching a few times is ok to get the different powerups - but keeping on repeatably leeching should not be allowed IMO.
Kranser.
Re: ASYLUM - PAC 3,820
Thanks! I beaten the game at last!