I'd like to commet on Iur Dhurin's description he put under his nibbler score when he asked if Phil used a cheat to get his score of almost 10M pts. I don't know enough about the game, but can tell you that scores on this game range into the hundreds of millions of points with a 16M on Mark Longridges page and the world record being just over 1B (yes billion) pts. The story is in the TG book of world records explaining the different attempts Tim McVey did before he finally reached the first Billion on any video game.
<p>
Regards,
Steve Krogman
--
skrogman@concentric.net
[no subject]
Moderator: Chad
-
Mark Longridge
Steve, it sounds like you didn't watch Phil Lamat's INP file.
He's clearing screens before he even eats all the objects.
*AND* Iur Dhurin does eat every object on each screen, *AND* he's
using the same version of mame (version 34).
<p>
Iur Dhurin also uses a stalling technique I saw in the arcades,
by hitting a wall to stall the nibbler. Phil never seems to need
to do that.
<p>
It's also possible that Nibbler is running at the wrong speed, I'm
not certain.
--
cubeman@iname.com
He's clearing screens before he even eats all the objects.
*AND* Iur Dhurin does eat every object on each screen, *AND* he's
using the same version of mame (version 34).
<p>
Iur Dhurin also uses a stalling technique I saw in the arcades,
by hitting a wall to stall the nibbler. Phil never seems to need
to do that.
<p>
It's also possible that Nibbler is running at the wrong speed, I'm
not certain.
--
cubeman@iname.com
-
lagavulin
I used to play to this game a lot some months ago and made a wide
variety of different scores on different machines : about 700000 pts
on a 486 66MHz and only 100000 points on a P III 500 MHz. So, I think
this game is sensitive to the speed of the computer and that's why we
can see low scores and very high scores. I definitely abandoned when
Phil made his 10 M score, but I know Phil uses an old and slow
computer. This is probably an explanation for his other high scores
which trigger off some recent discussions...
--
darre@club-internet.fr
variety of different scores on different machines : about 700000 pts
on a 486 66MHz and only 100000 points on a P III 500 MHz. So, I think
this game is sensitive to the speed of the computer and that's why we
can see low scores and very high scores. I definitely abandoned when
Phil made his 10 M score, but I know Phil uses an old and slow
computer. This is probably an explanation for his other high scores
which trigger off some recent discussions...
--
darre@club-internet.fr
-
Mark Longridge
Also Steve, the 16 million point score on my page was never
verified by an INP file.
--
cubeman@iname.com
verified by an INP file.
--
cubeman@iname.com
-
lagavulin
Mark,
Phil's clearing screens - some, not all ! - before he even eats all
the objects, that's right. But I did too. In some stages ( quite rare,
fortunately ), screen was automatically ended without reason. I never
understood why.
--
darre@club-internet.fr
Phil's clearing screens - some, not all ! - before he even eats all
the objects, that's right. But I did too. In some stages ( quite rare,
fortunately ), screen was automatically ended without reason. I never
understood why.
--
darre@club-internet.fr
-
Ben Jos Walbeehm
I would have liked this game in a previous life. Actually, I played a
few quite similar ones on the Commodore 64. Anyway, all I'm trying to
get at is that I don't feel like testing the following, but it seems
to me that if you eat (at least) a certain number of objects before
the timer reaches 900, you automatically advance to the next wave.
<p>
Ben Jos.
--
walbeehm@walbeehm.com
few quite similar ones on the Commodore 64. Anyway, all I'm trying to
get at is that I don't feel like testing the following, but it seems
to me that if you eat (at least) a certain number of objects before
the timer reaches 900, you automatically advance to the next wave.
<p>
Ben Jos.
--
walbeehm@walbeehm.com
-
JoustGod
Hmmm...we have the evidence through Mr. Lagavulin's testimony. Now,
should we ask if checking of framerates to ensure equal play between
MARPers is possibly illegal in France? Aha! Then that would explain
it all!
<p>
The saga continues...
<p>
JoustGod
--
pinballwiz1@msn.com
should we ask if checking of framerates to ensure equal play between
MARPers is possibly illegal in France? Aha! Then that would explain
it all!
<p>
The saga continues...
<p>
JoustGod
--
pinballwiz1@msn.com
-
Cicca
lagavulin....ALL DAMN games are sensitive to speed, emulated or not
!!! But that's not a justification for Lamat (and others)
behaviuor....and scores....<br>
As I posted time ago, I showed that what Lamat did could be done with
my 200Mhz PC slowered down to 50 Mhz, not 166 !!!<br><br>Cicca
(getting tired of howling.....)
--
cicca@writeme.com
!!! But that's not a justification for Lamat (and others)
behaviuor....and scores....<br>
As I posted time ago, I showed that what Lamat did could be done with
my 200Mhz PC slowered down to 50 Mhz, not 166 !!!<br><br>Cicca
(getting tired of howling.....)
--
cicca@writeme.com
-
phil
For you , Cicca, slow is slowering : I know all of you are working on
informatic but this is not my case ; my pc was bought in 1995 (before
the pentium era) and for the moment I have nore the wish either the
money to change it ; one year ago I was one of the first to speak
about speed problems on the board , but nobody answered me at this
occasion.
So now I'm fed up of beeing howled at, and guys like mister
"GrouseGod" should come back to play instead of uttering racist
sentences against my country
<p>
About nibbler : the "non all points eaten" on certain levels is
probably an emulation default (elsewhere my 9M game ends by a bug) ;
concerning the game there is about a dozen of different mazes , not
more ; when I played this game I elaborated ways for each maze and the
world record of 1 billion Steve speaked about doesn't surprise me :
after level 20 it's always the same mazes and you have one more live
each 4 waves, so the only difficulty is to fight the tiredness !
A precision : there is a difference between nibbler and nibblera after
level 32 : when you die, you need to restart the level from the
beginning on nibblera ; this is not the case in nibbler (just to
prevent new grouse howlings)
<p>
Phil
--
plamat@club-internet.fr
informatic but this is not my case ; my pc was bought in 1995 (before
the pentium era) and for the moment I have nore the wish either the
money to change it ; one year ago I was one of the first to speak
about speed problems on the board , but nobody answered me at this
occasion.
So now I'm fed up of beeing howled at, and guys like mister
"GrouseGod" should come back to play instead of uttering racist
sentences against my country
<p>
About nibbler : the "non all points eaten" on certain levels is
probably an emulation default (elsewhere my 9M game ends by a bug) ;
concerning the game there is about a dozen of different mazes , not
more ; when I played this game I elaborated ways for each maze and the
world record of 1 billion Steve speaked about doesn't surprise me :
after level 20 it's always the same mazes and you have one more live
each 4 waves, so the only difficulty is to fight the tiredness !
A precision : there is a difference between nibbler and nibblera after
level 32 : when you die, you need to restart the level from the
beginning on nibblera ; this is not the case in nibbler (just to
prevent new grouse howlings)
<p>
Phil
--
plamat@club-internet.fr