teign audit

Q.T.Quazar · Post by **Q.T.Quazar** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:26 pm

Chad · Post by **Chad** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:15 pm

i haven't tested these but i will zereo them because there are so few (2) mac confirmers and thus a "higher" percentage of the mac confirmers (2 out of 2) can't play them back over the (3 strikes out of 100s) 3 vs. the rest of marp rule. Teign, i encourage you to get in contact with these guys if there are funky settings you used that will make these play back these are nice high scores.

Q.T.Quazar · Post by **Q.T.Quazar** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:57 pm

thanks, Chad. i was in contact via e-mail with teign over a month ago, and informed him that there were problems with these .inps, so he is aware.

i couldn't get his other two unconfirmed scores to play back either, but to my knowledge, Rick has not checked them (tac/scan, super glob)

LN2 · Post by **LN2** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 10:43 pm

They don't need to be deleted...but just corrected to the scores I pointed out they playback to. A couple of them playback to a decent score and are still worthy of those points.

I had e-mailed teign about this a month ago and he said he is busy with other stuff now and didn't mind whatever was done to those.

LN2 · Post by **LN2** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 10:47 pm

Q.T.Quazar wrote:i couldn't get his other two unconfirmed scores to play back either, but to my knowledge, Rick has not checked them (tac/scan, super glob)

No..I had tried to confirm these and asked in this forum to have those zeroed out eons ago.

Those posts were overlooked I guess. I had e-mailed teign about those specifically and he said at that time he couldn't evne get them to playback either so go ahead and delete/zero those.

Why is it Q.T. posts stuff like this and it gets immediate attention while my posts here are overlooked?!?

I had posted about the above stuff at

viewtopic.php?t=10743

I list the scores each of the above play back to.

then a week or so later posted a reminder just to get it at the top of the thread list again....yet still was overlooked. oh well.

While I have some editor's attention...can we get the "piranha" romset thing taken care of also? I posted about that in the regulation forum a month or so ago.

In short starting with 0.68 the rom set "piranha" was renamed to "piranhah" and a complete rom set for piranha was added to mame and named "piranha"....

so all scores for "piranha" and 'piranha-fast" using 0.67 or older need to be moved to "piranhah" and "piranhah-fast".

...then for "piranha" special rule added saying at least version 0.68 must be used for this game.

I had run an audit on the rom sets and it's definitely apparent that the "piranhah" rom set is identical to the "piranha" rom set used in 0.67 and earlier.

Chad · Post by **Chad** » Sun Aug 17, 2003 2:36 pm

finaly got around to zeroing the bullfgt recording, but qt your bullfgtj rec still doesn't playback with win98, 32 or dos. anyone else care to try?

http://marp.retrogames.com/inp/1/b/7/qc ... _m37b7.zip
http://marp.retrogames.com/index.cgi?mo ... 00&tourn=0

Q.T.Quazar · Post by **Q.T.Quazar** » Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:39 pm

um...you didn't actually delete his bullfgt recording--it's still there. not sure what you did delete. the recording you listed for me (bullfgtj) does not look like it is going to play back, which is a bit of a piss off because there was a small ROM change and i'm wondering if that's what is throwing it.

anyway, i can rerecord. i double-checked my bullfgt .inp, and it, on the other hand, plays back perfectly (i remember having to remove the previous one because IT failed to playback)