Just coming off my Time Soldier high (probably my proudest MARP achievement yet, even though no one else is playing it), I noticed something weird... zipped up it's 107k, even though it only encompassed about a half hour or so of gameplay. Looking back at other zips of mine, the 1942 ones are 60k-70k, even though it takes about an hour to complete. My two-hour Nova 2001 recording was 100k.
<p>
Is it the analog control that makes the recordings bigger? Would make sense to me, considering that more player inputs need to be recorded to the file for proper playback. My Heavy Barrel recordings are around 70k, and Midnight Resistance less than 50k... I forget how long it takes to finish these games, but they're certainly not THAT long.
<p>
Hard drive space isn't a concern, I'm just curious to know if this is why they're bigger...
<p>
-BBH
--
lordbbh@aol.com
.INP sizes
Moderator: Chad
-
Zwaxy
You're right - it's because of the analogue inputs. Take a look at the size of any centipede recording, and you'll see that they are a lot bigger than non-analogue games. Analogue inputs are 8 bit inputs, and moving the mouse a little can affect a lot of bits, so from frame to frame there's a lot of changes to store. With a joystick, you're probably not going to change its position more than a few times a second, and each movement only affects one or two bits, so the zip program can compress the recording really well. When you move a mouse, though, the 8-bit number(s) change with every frame, leaving less score for compression.
<p>
As far as disk space goes, the recordings take up most of the space at MARP (not surprisingly):
<p>
11.9 megs of graphics, including screen shots
47.5 megs of old versions of MAME
107.6 megs of recordings
<p>
Chris.
--
zwaxy@bigfoot.com
<p>
As far as disk space goes, the recordings take up most of the space at MARP (not surprisingly):
<p>
11.9 megs of graphics, including screen shots
47.5 megs of old versions of MAME
107.6 megs of recordings
<p>
Chris.
--
zwaxy@bigfoot.com
-
***PL***
I still think it's pretty amazing that almost 6000 MAME recordings
only take up 0.1 GB of space!
--
laffaye@ibm.net
only take up 0.1 GB of space!
--
laffaye@ibm.net
-
Zwaxy
In fact, as of now it's something like 8939 recordings taking up
107.955 megs, making for an average of something like 12077 bytes
each.
<p>
The site's scripts keep a record of all the recordings ever
submitted, and often people submit scores which better their own old
recordings. These old recordings don't show up on the searches, but
they're still kept, just in case the new recordings don't play back.
<p>
Chris.
--
zwaxy@bigfoot.com
107.955 megs, making for an average of something like 12077 bytes
each.
<p>
The site's scripts keep a record of all the recordings ever
submitted, and often people submit scores which better their own old
recordings. These old recordings don't show up on the searches, but
they're still kept, just in case the new recordings don't play back.
<p>
Chris.
--
zwaxy@bigfoot.com
Thanks for the info