Page 4 of 23

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 12:05 pm
by Haze
Larcen Tyler wrote:How about this one:

TX-1 (Atari/Namco/Taito License) - tx1a
(The regular TX-1 isn't properly emulated yet.)
are you saying it's missing from the database, or should be archived because the parent doesn't work?

there are lots of games where the parent sets don't work..

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:40 pm
by Larcen Tyler
AFAIK, it's missing from the database.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:56 pm
by ***PL***
Both tx1 & tx1a are in the database. Click on "1st" or "Top3" to see yourself...

If no one can play them and submit a score, there is no need to archive.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 12:18 am
by Larcen Tyler
OK, noted. However, I read that if you are in first place, you have to use WolfMAME .106? I'm not sure if I read that correctly, but TX-1 doesn't work with that version. I think you need .130 or higher. I know it works with .131 though.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 12:43 am
by ***PL***
You must use WolfMAME to take 1st place at MARP.

You must use WolfMAME .106 if you want to submit your score to TG.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:47 am
by Phil Lamat
ANY wolfmame is good to take 1st place for Marp, this is rule 3b :
http://replay.marpirc.net/rules/

So yes, you can use wolf130 or higher here

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 10:49 pm
by Larcen Tyler
Is there a GUI version for Windows? If so, I'll download it right away.

Also, I have a screencap for TX-1, since we don't have one on file. Is there a place I can submit it?

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 11:31 pm
by mahlemiut
Use M+GUI. It's basically the MAME Plus GUI as a standalone product, written using Qt.

Works with MAME/MESS (Win32), or SDLMAME/SDLMESS (Win32,Linux,OS X)

http://www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/sh ... Post189736

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 5:50 pm
by Chad
Larcen Tyler wrote:Also, I have a screencap for TX-1, since we don't have one on file. Is there a place I can submit it?
PM me it.

I've got a picture just not uploaded yet (from your previous recording, i think with the Eiffel tower and 3 cars in a turn), if yours shows more action in one shot then i'll use it.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:45 pm
by Larcen Tyler
I need something that will work with WolfMAME .131

I tried using the command line version and had no luck.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:33 pm
by mahlemiut
Larcen Tyler wrote:I need something that will work with WolfMAME .131
M+GUI should work fine with 0.131.

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:06 pm
by Larcen Tyler
Unfortunately, that link didn't work. Any other place I can get M+GUI?

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:46 am
by mahlemiut
You can get it from one of the MAME Plus mirrors. Try http://mameicons.free.fr/mame32p/

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:39 am
by il_kornutazzo
Just an easy question: is there any special reason for which "Poker Ladies" (and clones) hasn't been archived together with other gambling games?
I tried to play many hands of this game, but never saw that skill is rewarded in any way. Btw, the game often teases the player proposing interesting projects (4 cards on 5) like straights, flushes, straight flushes and royal flushes... to make him change obviously one only card and then catch him with the damned "uuu loooooose". Only very few times the player can get the expected score. Besides in the most of hands, if u try to change all the 5 cards in order to see if another choice (based only on luck) instead of the most obvious one would have better rewarded u, u'll realize often that u would have lost the hand anyway (mostly matching some couple worse than JJ)...

Re: Archive these games -topic

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:54 am
by ***PL***
There are too many to archive on an individual basis. In the near future, the hope at MARP is to group by genre and either have them not count towards leaderboard points or simply archive.