Re: The Official M.A.R.P. Conspiracy Theory -thread
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:15 pm
nanu - nanu !!
Forums for MARP
http://marpirc.net/
If it's not fake that completely demolishes all claims the "documentary" has... There's no reason to fake it then; they are not in "Earth low orbit".kernzy wrote:1.
yes, it is a manufactured image of the real earth, but with trickery.
2. it is not fake.
Saying that camera fills the whole window at that particular moment of filming is not lying. Nobody said that they couldn't move the camera later on.i'm trying to prove that the astronaught lied.
The only camera trickery is from the makers of "documentary". There's no need to film "through a hole" if you can film the whole Earth as seen in pic 2.3. yes. if camera trickery is involved, how can you trust it at all?
They did not use props. The documentary is lying to you, using two different clips as one. After all they don't have a documentary without conspiracy.if they could reach the position, they would have just taken the shot naturally, not using PROPS.
That's just silly. You can see the dimmed out ceiling light during the clip. Of course they dim out the lights for better pictures.As far as i've seen, they never blacked out the cabin for anything else. the inside of the cabin was made to look like deep space.
What you don't understand is that this "documentary" uses two different clips and claims them as one; one taken about "small Earth" and the other when they put lights on.then the camera pans out, and you see a light on the wall.
The only thing comedic with it is that someone is taking this amateurish "documentary" seriously.it's almost black comedy. like a monty python sketch!!!
I have already linked couple HD clips on youtube.i would much more believe a modern picture of moon litter than any old shaky purposely low res video filmed off a screen for public viewing.
kernzy wrote:then the hubble, incapable of viewing the moon surface. what about the inbetween bit? so no telescope can view the lunar surface, but, on the other hand can take this deep field image?
Can Hubble see the Apollo landing sites on the Moon?
No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.
An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.
http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/fa ... cat=topten
Are the colors in Hubble images real?
There are no "natural color" cameras aboard the Hubble and never have been. The optical cameras on board have all been digital CCD cameras, which take images as grayscale pixels.
Sometimes the color is as natural as possible. However, the color given to the images is not just "artistic embellishment." The images are, indeed, downloaded as black and white, and color is added for a number of different reasons
http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/fa ... bbleimages