KoA3 Poll

Archive of the old message board

Moderator: Chad

Postby Barry Rodewald » Sat Feb 23, 2002 12:30 pm

Oh yay!
<p>

Latest version, no point in missing out on half the games in MAME now.

<p>

Mervel vs. Capcom in KoA3 plz! ;)

--
bsr@hnpl.net
Barry Rodewald
 

Postby Barry Rodewald » Sat Feb 23, 2002 12:30 pm

And obviously I can't spell. :/
<p>

This board needs an 'edit post' function.

--
bsr@hnpl.net
Barry Rodewald
 

Postby BBH » Sat Feb 23, 2002 12:30 pm

TGMAME. Since not all of us have computers that run the newer versions of MAME all that well.

<p>


-BBH

--
lordbbh@aol.com
BBH
 

Postby QRS » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

TG mame
<p>

QRS

--
qrs@telia.com
QRS
 

Postby Stig Remnes » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

Once again.
<p>

LATEST MAME !

<p>

THOUGH IF YOU COUNT THE LATEST NANE(56) VOTE, LATEST MAME SHOULD BEEN
CHOSEN.

<p>

Stig

--
sremnes@hotmail.com
Stig Remnes
 

Postby J.D. Lowe » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

True, Stig, but alas, he didn't vote for latest MAME; he specifically stated so:

<p>

"I vote for, not the latest version, but .56 "

<p>

I might as well finally vote myself; I vote for TG MAME.

<p>

- J.D. Lowe Knockout Chair

--
jedidrunkenllama@hotmail.com
J.D. Lowe
 

Postby phil » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

35tg for the moment
<p>

but I'm still dreaming for a more recent tg version ; who can do
that ? mark, benjos ? please ... there is a lot of games we all would
like to play in future tourneys, not only m35 games ...

<p>

phil

--
plamat@club-internet.fr
phil
 

Postby Joe Ledesma » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

Maybe, if possible, it would be possible to compile a special mame for the KOA3? That way, it's speedy for the slower computer users, but we
still get to play any game currently supported by MAME. Just a
thought, maybe someone (myself even?) would be willing to do so, or
even as a group thing.

--
JoeyL21988@yahoo.com
Joe Ledesma
 

Postby Chris Parsley » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

Scratches head, I do have a later TG Mame edition than 35 final....
<p>

It was made/compiled as of 37b9...

--
cparsley1@hotmail.com
Chris Parsley
 

Postby J.D. Lowe » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

I hate to be redundant, but to point out above:
<p>

"I've been advised in the past not to use m37b9tg due to issues out
of my control (that's why back in Deca2001, we had to revert back to
m35tg3b); so this version is not allowed during KoA3."

<p>

- J.D. Lowe Knockout Chair

--
jedidrunkenllama@hotmail.com
J.D. Lowe
 

Postby LordGaz » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

Latest MAME, it works better for and fast enough for me on this 333Mhz machine and the display is crisp. Just have to fiddle about
with some of the advanced settings a bit, ticking the stretching
option actually brings some games up to 100% speed. Win36 had
crackly sound too.

--
garyjlee@hotmail.com
LordGaz
 

Postby Stig Remnes » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

Joey, intresting suggestion. How will you make it faster ?

<p>

Stig

--
sremnes@hotmail.com
Stig Remnes
 

Postby Joe Ledesma » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

By re-compiling it with only the selected games and corresponding drivers, and changing the source code to reflect, I believe it should
run faster. I'm not 100% sure, but the more games/drivers/code added
to MAME makes it run slower, and by removing the unnecessaries for the
tourney would make it run faster. That is my theory, it is possible
that I could be wrong.

--
JoeyL21988@yahoo.com
Joe Ledesma
 

Postby Barry Rodewald » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

The number of game drivers aren't what slow down MAME, other than maybe making the executable ever so slightly larger, requiring more
RAM (the MAME exe is 12MB as it is), but on straight CPU power, it
doesn't.

--
bsr@hnpl.net
Barry Rodewald
 

Postby Joe Ledesma » Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm

What does make MAME slower then? And would recompiling a much smaller version of MAME make it run faster?

--
JoeyL21988@yahoo.com
Joe Ledesma
 

PreviousNext

Return to Message Board Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron