T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Discussion about MARP's Tournaments

Moderator: giro-X

User avatar
ballas
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:24 am
Location: Johannesburg, South africa.

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by ballas » Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:17 am

Is this game broken on Wold 0.106? Or is there a chance we can play on 0.106 for thsi title?
KVD
Koos van Dyk
Johannesburg
SOUTH AFRICA

saulonpb2
Button Masher
Button Masher
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:26 am
Contact:

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by saulonpb2 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:48 am

Last edited by saulonpb2 on Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:51 pm, edited 4 times in total.
The Expert keyboard

User avatar
ballas
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:24 am
Location: Johannesburg, South africa.

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by ballas » Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:52 am

Just double checking if Beejays score of T12 (9-4) - 105 is correct. Just want to knwo taht we are all calculating the right way. One match one = 100 + 5 points difference, or should we minus the 2nd game played by the points lost by as well.
KVD
Koos van Dyk
Johannesburg
SOUTH AFRICA

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by Phil Lamat » Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:46 am

ballas wrote:Just double checking if Beejays score of T12 (9-4) - 105 is correct. Just want to knwo taht we are all calculating the right way. One match one = 100 + 5 points difference, or should we minus the 2nd game played by the points lost by as well.
Lost game also counts.
I've fixed Beejay's score and put an example in special rules to avoid future confusions

User avatar
ballas
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:24 am
Location: Johannesburg, South africa.

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by ballas » Wed Feb 06, 2013 5:59 am

Phil Lamat wrote:
ballas wrote:Just double checking if Beejays score of T12 (9-4) - 105 is correct. Just want to knwo taht we are all calculating the right way. One match one = 100 + 5 points difference, or should we minus the 2nd game played by the points lost by as well.
Lost game also counts.
I've fixed Beejay's score and put an example in special rules to avoid future confusions
Cool thanks!
KVD
Koos van Dyk
Johannesburg
SOUTH AFRICA

User avatar
empardopo
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:40 pm
Location: Málaga
Contact:

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by empardopo » Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:33 am

ballas wrote:Just double checking if Beejays score of T12 (9-4) - 105 is correct. Just want to knwo taht we are all calculating the right way. One match one = 100 + 5 points difference, or should we minus the 2nd game played by the points lost by as well.
Ballas, you also can see it in my record MARP (9-2, 9-2, 3-5 are 212 points).
Thanks Phil!

Greetings
Empardopo.

User avatar
empardopo
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:40 pm
Location: Málaga
Contact:

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by empardopo » Wed Feb 06, 2013 7:47 am

ballas wrote:Is this game broken on Wold 0.106? Or is there a chance we can play on 0.106 for thsi title?
Two years ago I had problems with that version. I cannot view the scored record!
Only to avoid problems It's better to use the 141 version.

Greetings
Empardopo.

User avatar
Barra
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:57 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by Barra » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:46 am

Played this a couple of times last year best I could manage was about 320 (going by marp scoring system)
May play this soon
Andrew Barrow

User avatar
ballas
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:24 am
Location: Johannesburg, South africa.

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by ballas » Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:18 am

Barra wrote:Played this a couple of times last year best I could manage was about 320 (going by marp scoring system)
May play this soon
Haha, yeah I remember we had a MAME COTW, I think it was only me and you playing...
KVD
Koos van Dyk
Johannesburg
SOUTH AFRICA

saulonpb2
Button Masher
Button Masher
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:26 am
Contact:

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by saulonpb2 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:31 pm

9- 3
9-3
and

4 - 3 is victory not loose we must add 100 isn´t true??

look special rules
SCORING :
Score = 100xwins + points difference (including lost game).
Last edited by saulonpb2 on Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Expert keyboard

BeeJay
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:40 am

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by BeeJay » Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:38 pm

Phil Lamat wrote:
ballas wrote:Just double checking if Beejays score of T12 (9-4) - 105 is correct. Just want to knwo taht we are all calculating the right way. One match one = 100 + 5 points difference, or should we minus the 2nd game played by the points lost by as well.
Lost game also counts.
I've fixed Beejay's score and put an example in special rules to avoid future confusions
Sorry - it wasn't clear from the special rules that you needed to include the points difference from the last round as well. I just assumed the final round didn't count as someone doesn't deserve to gain points out of a round where they ended up not completing the round. I'll be sure to include the final round points difference in future. :)

Cheers,
BeeJay.

BeeJay
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:40 am

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by BeeJay » Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:42 pm

saulonpb2 wrote:9- 3
9-3
and

4 - 3 is victory not loose we must add 100 isn´t true??

look special rules
SCORING :
Score = 100xwins + points difference (including lost game).
My take would be that 4-3 is not a win as you win by getting 9 points. 4-3 is an incomplete round with a positive points difference but no 100 points bonus.

Cheers,
BeeJay.

saulonpb2
Button Masher
Button Masher
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:26 am
Contact:

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by saulonpb2 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 5:27 pm

this is not writting in special rules.
The Expert keyboard

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by Phil Lamat » Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:35 am

BeeJay wrote: it wasn't clear from the special rules that you needed to include the points difference from the last round as well
It's just so that a 9-0 5-5 is counted better than a 9-0 0-5

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: T12 - Round 9 - Squash

Post by Phil Lamat » Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:36 am

saulonpb2 wrote:this is not writting in special rules.
Now it is, I've added what seemed to be obvious to me.
I gonna correct your score, which should reinstate your previous entry as your PB

Post Reply